No, really, I didn't! I have been tossing and turning it around in my mind for a week, but since her latest comment, it's going to look like I did.
Well, folks, great minds worry alike! Here goes:
How do you justify spending $4000 to travel to India to help out Sarah's kids?
What I mean is, think what $4000 would do in India! Cash. Dinero. Rupees. 190, 373.5 rupees, to be exact.
So what if Rose Bud and I stayed home and just sent the money? What if our whole group of 15 people did? (ok, THAT thought I DID steal from Leslie)
What justifies going as opposed to just giving?
Is this just selfish wanting-to-go-to-India on my part?
I'm a bad user-of-scripture to support my position. I tend to think I "get" God and know what he wants.
Isn't there something in the Bible about being his hands and feet? I can't find it on Bible Gateway.
I always feel a little wicked (ooh, I just accidentally typed "wicken." Wonder what that Freudian slip means??? I know. It's not spelled "wicken" so probably it means nothing)
Back to my thought... I always feel a little wicked searching out Bible verses to support what I want to say/think/do. Like I'm manipulating God. I could probably come up with a verse to support whatever position I want to take. I'm sure that's not how it works. After all the Bible is there for God to talk to us, right?
I am way off track. This tangent has gone into outer space.
Anyway, go vs. send. I'm sure there are some Bible verses to support going. I know God loves a cheerful giver.
I do have some coherent thoughts in answer to my conundrum, but that is for the next post.
The 6 things children need
1 day ago